I would be firmly accountable for things that are true and the false accusations I would probably say "I can see how you would think that of me, I have given you every reason to believe that. But that’s just not where my thoughts were at the time. What I did was not loving and I am so angry at myself for what I did. You clearly didn’t deserve it"
I see what hikingout is getting at. It's very difficult when a BS latches on to a version of the truth that is not, in fact, true. You should not try to solve the problem by lying your way out of it, even if that lie ostensibly helps the BS at your own expense. That being said, I'm wondering if we're getting hung up on a distinction that's too subjective for definitive "truth." At what point does gleeful indifference to someone's pain cross the line into enjoyment of that pain? How reliable a narrator can we be when one version of events makes us even more heinous than another?
We had a troll here for a while who kept cycling back under different usernames. He was utterly convinced that his WW's AP was better endowed than him and that they had freakier, more satisfying sex. Nothing she said (or we said) could convince him otherwise. He was hell bent on getting her to admit it. It's possible he was just a sick asshole who came here to yank our chains, because he always made up a different backstory, and it's obviously a very triggering topic. But assuming his trolling odyssey was driven by real trauma, both he and his WW were in a no win situation. He didn't believe a word she told him, and for good reason. Even if she was being absolutely honest, he was never going to accept that truth. They were permanently stuck.
In your situation, though, there's nothing objective to measure. It's not "he thinks Average AP had a ten inch schlong and won't let go until I admit it." It's much more subjective. You were openly and aggressively texting the AP in front of your husband and then laughing about his suspicions with AP and your friend. Is the distinction between "I did it to hurt him" and "I didn't care about hurting him" actually clear here? It's one thing to sneak around behind someone's back and turn off the thoughts of how they would be hurt if they knew. But when you see it in front of you, and you find it funny... is it actually untrue to say that you were getting a rush from your BH's pain?
IDK. I feel like if my H did what you did, and then told me "I can see why you would feel that way," I'd feel managed and sidestepped rather than validated. Maybe this exercise will help:
- Describe (to yourself) a few scenarios where you do something with AP to deliberately hurt your husband, as opposed to ignoring the hurt.
- How/why is the impact of that type of action and motivation any different from the impact of what you did?
- Why do you think that the actions in those imaginary scenarios would have been off limits in your moral code while you embraced the actions you describe in your post?
Final analogy, because this is getting very long. Sometimes, members here will observe that all WS are someone's AP. In my case, the OM was single, so I didn't create an OBS. However, I don't think I get any credit for that. If hurting my own spouse didn't stop me from cheating, I can't reasonably believe that I'd have hit the wall of my moral code at hurting someone else's wife. So if you didn't feel the slightest twinge at hurting your BH to escalate things with your AP, what would have happened if AP had wanted to escalate that deliberate humiliation? What, if anything, would have stopped you?
[This message edited by BraveSirRobin at 1:34 PM, Saturday, March 16th]